Pensées #2: The Oscars 2019

I’m not sure what to expect from the Oscars this year. We are 9 days away from nominations being announced and a mere month and a half away from the actual show. I’ve been wondering for a while when the producers would pick their new host, but now, through a basic google search, learn that this year’s Oscars will be without a host, and will simply have a series of presenters. That sounds awful, though it’s not without precedent apparently. Another basic google search reveals that the 1989 Academy Awards went on without a host. Looking at reviews of that ceremony doesn’t inspire confidence. Gregory Peck, Julie Andrews, Paul Newman, and Billy Wilder called it an embarrassment.

Image result for oscars 2019 kevin hart'

*Overreaction warning:* The backlash Kevin Hart received and subsequent resignation from Oscar hosting duties is yet another example of ultra-toxic Twitter ruining the award ceremony. Twitter junkies, people who have no power whatsoever in reality, have found a malignant sense of power on social media, but it only works en masse, and it doesn’t mix well with reason. Why are you, the Academy, listening to them?

Kevin Hart shouldn’t have to apologize for bad jokes made several years ago, especially when he’s already apologized. Whether you’re a fan of his comedy or not, Hart has a considerable fan base, and he’s an entertainer. He’s capable of handling this enormous job, or, I guess, he was.

As only a moderate fan of Hart’s, the bigger issue to me is that I’m afraid we’ve seen the last of edgy comedians hosting the Oscars. Every comic worth his salt has a joke or two in their past that will get them disbarred by the Twitter PC authorities. If it’s true, as has been reported, that no one wanted to host the Oscars before the Hart blowup, then it’s doubly true now.

I’ve already shared my feelings on 2018 as a film year. In a word, weak. Naturally, the Oscar nominations in a week or so will reflect the lack of strong candidates mainly in the Best Picture category (there were many fine performances this year). Bohemian Rhapsody won the Golden Globe’s equivalent of Best Picture. That’s almost absurd. It’s an entertaining film, and I certainly won’t be upset about a Rami Malek victory, but the overall picture is lacking. Since the quality of candidates is down, how about some parity? A grand mystery: what will win this year’s Best Picture. Every year, we’re pretty sure what will win or we know it’s between two films. This year: How about shock and awe?

The Golden Globes granted some clarity in terms of award season favorites. I wouldn’t be upset if the Globe winners in the acting categories carry over into the Oscars. Malek and Ali’s performances I’ve seen, and would like to see rewarded. I haven’t seen Olivia Coleman’s performance in The Favourite or Regina King in If Beale Street Could Talk, but those are two films I eagerly anticipate watching.

If Alfonso Cuarón wins his second Oscar this year, that would make it 5 times in the last 6 years that a Mexican director has won Best Director. Quite an impressive run made by three talented artists. A foreign film has never won Best Picture, but what if this was the year? I’d almost be disappointed since Roma is not a masterpiece in my estimation, and I wish something like Pan’s Labyrinth or Talk to Her took the honor.

Actors don’t seem to realize that the Oscars is a show, and as such, needs to be entertaining. I’m crossing my fingers for a sense of pace, some showbiz razzle-dazzle, and a limited amount of self -aggrandizing motivational speeches. Also, I might agree with an actor politically, but that doesn’t mean I want to hear about it in this setting.

RIP to the Academy Award for Outstanding Achievement in Popular Film. You were a horrible idea, and I’m so glad that you will never see the light of day. What does achievement in popular film even mean? If they were going to go through with this award, instead of handing the winner a trophy, they should have them stand in front of the podium as a bucket of Nickelodeon slime flips over and spills its contents all over them. Has any one said yet whether the other horrible idea (technical awards being handed out before broadcast) was scrapped also?

-Walter Tyrone Howard-



Pensées #1: 2018 was a Bad Movie Year

Sayonara 2018. You were one of the weakest movie years in recent memory. Fanboys might point to Black Panther (decent) or Avengers: Infinity War (strong, though incomplete), but what truly great films did the year have to offer. 2018 was mired in sequels. Look at the year end top grossers: Marvel, sequels, and remakes.

  1. Black Panther
  2. Avengers: Infinity War
  3. Incredibles 2
  4. Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom
  5. Deadpool 2
  6. Dr. Seus’ The Grinch
  7. Mission Impossible: Fallout
  8. Ant-Man and the Wasp
  9. Solo: A Star Wars Story
  10. Venom

This wouldn’t be much of a problem if Oscar season hadn’t been so underwhelming. What are the big Oscar contenders this year? I don’t even know what the favorites are at this point, because nothing really stands out. A Star is Born was a good film. Roma was a good film. What else? There are a few films I still need to see: Green Book, Widows, and If Beale Street Could Talk. Hopefully, I’ll be blown away by one of these. Then, of course, I’ll eventually get to see some of the big foreign films of the year.

Image result for bored movie watcher

In any case, I couldn’t be more ready for 2019 with the potential of being a tremendous year. Right out of the gate, we get Glass (the conclusion to M. Night Shyamalan’s brilliant trilogy), and How to Train Your Dragon 3.

In 2019, Disney will be Scrooge McDuck, jumping off of a diving board, into a pool of money. Look at their lienup: The Lion King CGI remake, Aladdin live-action remake, Toy Story 4, Star Wars: episode 9, Dumbo, Avengers: Endgame, Frozen 2, Artemis Fowl, and Spiderman: Far From Home.

My most anticipated films of the year are: Us, Jordan Peele’s new horror flick, Wonder Woman 1984, Glass, the Star Wars finale, and Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.

 -Walter Tyrone Howard-




Christmas Film Challenge

I’ve failed. My goal was to watch and review 25 Christmas movies before the big day, and I knew it wouldn’t be easy, but I thought I could climb that mountain. Writing the reviews in time proved the challenging part. I came within seeing distance of my watching 25 movies goal. Here are the ones I saw. Let me count:

Image result for christmas movies

  1. The Nightmare Before Christmas
  2. A Christmas Prince
  3. Home Alone
  4. Four Christmases
  5. Christmas Inheritance
  6. The Man Who Invented Christmas
  7. The Princess Switch
  8. The Christmas Chronicles
  9. Elf
  10. Arthur Christmas
  11. The Santa Clause
  12. Frosty the Snowman
  13. Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer
  14. A Christmas Prince:The Royal Wedding
  15. It’s a Wonderful Life
  16. How the Grinch Stole Christmas
  17. Santa’s Surprise
  18. Santa’s Workshop
  19. Santa Claus is Comin’ to Town
  20. Angela’s Christmas
  21. Twas the Night Before Christmas

Of the films I viewed, It’s a Wonderful Life remains the best. I’m a traditionalist, so seeing this classic in its original black and white form every Christmas is a must. The Nightmare Before Christmas is also a great movie, but these are both films I’d seen before. Most of the new movies I watched this year were Netflix originals, and pretty basic. The Man Who Invented Christmas is probably the best new Christmas movie I had the opportunity to see. The twenty minute, amateurish short, Twas the Night Before Christmas is the worst film I watched. The animation is very poor, and even working from the classic poem, the reading of it felt stilted. Anyways, I’ll have to try this again next year.

-Walter Tyrone Howard-

20: Omaha Beach

Saving Private Ryan (1998)

I’m blown away that Saving Private Ryan did not win the Academy Award for Best Picture in ’98, and shocked that it lost to Shakespeare in Love of all things, a cute film that doesn’t even begin to measure up to Spielberg’s World War II masterpiece. As I continue my list of favorite film scenes, I’m bringing up the Omaha Beach scene from the latter. It stands out as the best in the film, a technical tour de force to this day; a wholly realistic immersive sequence. The scene is really around forty minutes long, essentially the film’s opener if you discount the graveyard framing device (which I find unnecessary), and around a fourth of the entire film’s runtime. There are a few things I notice, when watching it, that strike me as brilliant filmmaking. First, Spielberg shoots in tight close-up or obscured wide shot for most of the beach sequence. You can never get a proper bearing for where anything or anyone is, and the tension that creates is exacerbated by Spielberg never showing the enemy. It’s just chaos and violence. There are a couple of other details that might be clichéd now, but were really fresh the first time I saw the film, and still work effectively. One is the water and blood hitting the camera. I’ve seen this a few times since, but I’m not sure I’d ever seen it before Saving Private Ryan. A nice touch that creates a kind of guerrilla filmmaking feel that belies the massive Hollywood studio undertaking that Saving Private Ryan actually is.  The other memorable detail is the slow-motion, sound distorted portion of the scene where Captain Miller is traumatized.  Truly just a crafty way to show the protagonist struggling with the overwhelming experience.

-Walter Howard-

25 Films for Christmas (2018)

Think of all the Christmas classics: It’s a Wonderful Life, Miracle on 34th Street, Elf, White Christmas, A Christmas Story, Christmas Vacation, Jingle All the Way. Alright Jingle All the Way is not a classic, but I still end up seeing it every Winter. There’s a solid half-dozen Christmas films put out each year, but becoming a perennial holiday favorite is rare and elusive. What makes a Christmas movie endure? It’s a Wonderful Life quite famously wasn’t a hit in its own time, only achieving its towering status as an All-American Christmas masterpiece much later, through reruns on television. It takes a certain kind of magic that I’m not sure can really be qualified or broken down into anything tangible. Perhaps that could be something to ponder as I start my self-directed challenge. To the point: I plan on watching 25 Christmas movies over the next 55 days, and writing a review, as well as adding some personal details about how I watched it and my experience, for each one. Like most people, I have my Christmas favorites that I’ll likely mix in, but I would like to focus on ones I either haven’t seen or have only seen once. It’s my way of getting into the spirit of the holidays. Yes, it is a bit early, but I’ll need the extra time if I want to achieve this goal. Fifty five days gives me basically two per film and review, which I think is lofty enough to keep myself motivated, but also manageable. Here’s a short list of Christmas films I’ve made. These are ones I’m less acquainted with, if at all:

The Christmas Prince (2017)

Image result for the christmas prince

The Polar Express (2004)

Image result for the polar express

A Christmas Carol (2009)

Image result for a christmas carol 2009

This Christmas (2007)

Image result for this christmas 2007

Four Christmases (2008)

Image result for four christmases

Miracle on 34th Street (1994)

Image result for miracle on 34th street 1994

The Muppets Christmas Carol (1992)

Image result for the muppet christmas carol

Scrooged (1988)

Image result for scrooged

The Bishop’s Wife (1947)

Image result for the bishops wife

Meet Me in St Louis (1944)

Image result for meet me in st louis christmas

Any other suggestions? Watching these with my regularly slated lineup of films should put me over my goal of 25. It starts now.

-Walter Tyrone Howard-

10 Films I Actually Haven’t Seen

I’ve seen most movies. I’ve withstood numerous questions challenging my expertise, and all manner of trivia. Whatever type of film you want to throw at me, I’ve probably seen it: Bollywood, Martial Arts, Horror, ’30s Screwball Comedy, Surfer films of the ’60s, Italian Giallos, Westerns, European prize winners, flat out horrible films, what-have-you. But, alas, I haven’t seen every movie, though it’s my nonviable dream to do so. And, at the end of the day, if I had seen every film, what would I have left to do with my life? In any case, once a year, I make a list of a 100 films I haven’t seen that I deem most crucial for me to watch. Here are 10 films off of that list that would surprise people who know me.

American Sniper                                                 2014

Image result for american sniper

Why haven’t I seen this yet? I ask myself this question. Directed by Clint Eastwood and starring an Oscar nominated Bradley Cooper, American Sniper was a massive hit, making over $500 million world-wide. My first thought was, “it must have come out while you were in bootcamp.” Looking at its release date, I can see that’s clearly not the case. I was in college when it came out, and had plenty of time to stop by the local theater. I really don’t remember why I missed this film in theaters, and since then, I’ve just gone by, pretending I’ve seen it when talking to friends or family. Enough is enough. Time to watch it. It’s not even that I’m not interested. Who knows?

Armageddon                                   1998

Image result for armageddon

I haven’t seen Armageddon, because it looks like a bad film. I haven’t enjoyed a single Michael Bay movie I’ve watched, and, despite the dozens of bad films I find amusing, his movies don’t even provide a basic camp level of entertainment. They’re big, long, loud, and dumb, but it’s important to me not to judge a film before I’ve seen it. I may have already written Armageddon off in my mind, but it’s time I give it its fair chance. People seemed to like it (not critics, critics aren’t people). It made $550 million.

The Babadook                2014

Image result for the babadook

Here’s a film I started, really enjoyed, but was then cut off from. External circumstances. This Australian horror film received rave reviews upon release. A rare horror flick directed by a woman, apparently a promising new talent, Jennifer Kent, The Babadook is really my kind of movie. It’s been on Netflix for quite some time now, so my excuses are moot. Watch it! I’m sure by the time I sit down to watch it on Netflix, it will be gone.

The Blair Witch Project                        1999

Image result for blair witch project

Not all that interested in this one. Seems a bit gimmicky, and I missed the moment. It was a colossal hit in 1999, a unique point in movie history, better remembered for its innovative marketing campaign than for its product. It was one of the earliest pictures to make use of the internet in terms of advertising. Is the movie itself good? I’m really the only opinion I trust, so I’ll just have to watch and see for myself.

A Clockwork Orange                             1971

Image result for a clockwork orange

Both film and novel, I’ve started and stopped A Clockwork Orange a half dozen times now. Both film and novel are seated at the top of my to-do list. As for the film, directed by the great Stanley Kubrick, I know it’s going to be a rough watch, but at some point, I need to suck it up, and push through.

District 9                                     2009

Image result for district 9

Using an alien invasion as an allegory for apartheid in South Africa, Neill Blomkamp’s District 9 hit in a big way. It earned back 7 times its budget, and received 4 Oscar nominations including Best Picture. I don’t know what’s keeping me from seeing this. In truth, there are certain films that I have an irrational indifference to, and District 9 is one.

Paranormal Activity                  2007

Image result for paranormal activity

I missed this supernatural found footage film, and by the time I looked up again, there were already like 5 of them, watering down the whole product, making me not care. Still, I’ve heard it was legitimately scary, and well-made, so I’ll give it a shot.

The Seventh Seal                  1957

Image result for the seventh seal

I’ve seen a dozen Ingmar Bergman movies; a couple I love, some I hate, most I found boring. I haven’t seen his most famous work (at least internationally) which is The Seventh Seal starring Max Von Sydow as Death incarnate. A film buff needs to see this film. It’s as simple as that.

The Ten Commandments              1956

Image result for the ten commandments 1956

This 4 hour epic rendition of Moses’ story is one of the biggest hits of all-time. I’ve seen bits and pieces, but have never sat down on Easter and watched it from start to finish like so many people.

Tokyo Story                                       1953

Image result for tokyo story

Again, a true film buff has seen Tokyo Story. I have the means (I’ve owned a copy for some time now), and it’s just a matter of watching it. I guess I hear the film described as leisurely paced or languid and I get intimidated.

-Walter Tyrone Howard-

What If? 5 Alternate Casting Choices

What if games are as futile and inane as trying to keep a body count in your head while watching Death Wish 3- you can’t change time-and yet, they’re fun. Recently, I’ve been imagining certain films, great films even, with different actors in key roles. How dramatically that changes the film is a case by case situation, but there’s no question it reshapes each one. What follows is my five favorite alternate casting choices. I left off films that were beyond redeeming, such as The Last Airbender, which suffered from poor casting, but even with solid casting, couldn’t be saved. Most of my picks are great films that I feel could be even greater with these surrogate actors. Here goes:

Will Smith in Django Unchained

Image result for will smith django unchained

This was so close to happening. Tarantino wanted the superstar for the title role, but was apparently turned down by Smith. Django Unchained was the best movie of that year, and Tarantino is one of the best filmmakers going, so I’m more upset for what Smith missed in his career than what Django Unchained lost. I’ve heard that Smith wanted Django to be the one to kill Candy (ultimately played by DiCaprio), and was pushing back on a number of plot points. Why fight a Tarantino script? It’s a shame, since I really think Smith would have been fantastic in the role, as good as Jamie Foxx is. Smith has star power, and it would have been a bold move in his career. Instead, he did After Earth with his son, Jaden, trying to make him a star, and hasn’t fully recovered the box-office power he once had. You can’t stay on top without taking risks. Once you lose your power to surprise people, you lose your power. I really think Smith missed a huge opportunity.

Image result for django unchained

To be fair, he came out afterwards and had this to say, “It was about the creative direction of the story. To me, it’s as perfect a story as you could ever want: a guy that learns how to kill to retrieve his wife that has been taken as a slave. That idea is perfect. And it was just that Quentin and I couldn’t see [eye to eye].I wanted to make that movie so badly, but I felt the only way was, it had to be a love story, not a vengeance story. We can’t look at what happens in Paris [the terrorist attacks] and want to f— somebody up for that. Violence begets violence. I just couldn’t connect to violence being the answer. Love had to be the answer.” Alright, you can’t fault an actor for having principles, though I disagree with his assessment. If it really was all about principles, and disagreeing with the heart of the film, than that’s his prerogative.

Denzel Washington in Seven

Image result for denzel washington 1990s

Here’s another example of a star actor who turned down a great role. Denzel Washington was David Fincher’s first choice for the role of young detective, David Mills (a role that finally went to a very good Brad Pitt). Not that it has effected Washington’s career much, if at all, but can you imagine him paired with Morgan Freeman, who was just incredible as Detective Somerset? The two had already worked together in the classic Civil War drama, Glory. Seven would have been among Denzel’s best films, and would have benefited from both actors’ gravitas and charisma.

Image result for seven 1995

Denzel, himself, later commented that he passed on the role because he felt that it was “too dark and evil.” He says when he saw the finished product, he kicked himself. David Fincher wasn’t an established name at the time, having only directed one film, Aliens 3, which was, well…I can see it being difficult wanting to go out on a limb with that material with an unproven director.

Mel Gibson in Mad Max: Fury Road

Image result for mel gibson

This choice is slightly different. Mel Gibson, to my knowledge, was never offered the Mad Max role that Tom Hardy played in Fury Road. It’s also different, because Mel obviously originated the role in the landmark trilogy starting back in 1979. Mel Gibson is Mad Max, and no disrespect to Tom Hardy, who did an admirable job of putting on the shoes, but I don’t want to see anyone else in that role. I’ve heard talk about the reason for the switch being that Gibson was “too old,” for the role. I shake my head at that. I think old Mel Gibson could have been the best Mad Max yet. Picture the barren apocalyptic setting of the franchise. Picture all the death and destruction, and then picture an old, grizzled Gibson somehow surviving and outliving everyone and everything, even though he probably longs to die. That could have been incredible. Yes, Fury Road was great, and the best of 2015 already, but I truly believe it could have been better still. The real reason Gibson wasn’t hired, or likely considered, was that he was still in the doghouse for his boorish behavior several years prior. Here’s Tarintino on what could have been:

Michelle Williams in The Great Gatsby

Image result for michelle williams

Michelle Williams could be a great Daisy Buchanan. Carey Mulligan, who is an extraordinary actress, failed in my mind to make the requisite impression. Partly, I’m sure, the fault of the filmmakers, her Daisy gets lost in the shuffle, and becomes scenery. Leonardo DiCaprio and Joel Edgerton completely overpowered all of the other actors. Mulligan said about her performance, “I’m not sure if I kind of lost my way because I was intimidated by the scale of it. I think I might have been overawed by my experience and intimidated by the level of performances around me. It was how big it was and how visual it was. I definitely felt there were fleeting moments where I really found the character and then I felt like I lost her a little bit. I’ve never been wholly thrilled about my work in it.”

Image result for the great gatsby 2013

Williams’ performance as Marilyn Monroe in the film, My Week with Marilyn, really suggested to me that she was capable of handling this iconic, fictional, woman as well. Daisy, aloof, vapid, superficial, among such weighty male roles is a very difficult challenge. Actors are taught to get to the root of a character’s motivation, to give them depth, but that’s contrary to how the role of Daisy needs to be played, and then, on top of that, it’s directed by Baz Lurhmann, so there’s music blaring, choreographed dance numbers all around. It’s easy to get lost in the maelstrom.

Robert Downey Jr. in Inherent Vice

Image result for robert downey jr

Robert Downey Jr. as Doc Sportello seems like a no-brainer to me. Sportello is a weed smoking, wise-cracking, counter-cultural private eye in early 1970s Los Angeles. Instead Anderson reteamed with Joaquin Phoenix, 2 years after their sublime work together in The Master (2012). Phoenix mumbles his way through this 2 and 1/2 hour snooze fest. I didn’t like this film at all, and maybe I just missed the point completely, but I think Downey Jr. could have helped. He, at least, would have been intelligible, and might have brought some wit to go with the film’s aimless style. Downey Jr. was considered for the role, but was shot down eventually for being “too old.” That’s kind of bizarre to me.

Image result for inherent vice 2014

-Walter Tyrone Howard-